Welcome to this
ever changing website dealing with the
most preventable health issue in modern
society: cancer.
The cancer epidemic began post WWII and
has continued for around 70 odd years
without any real progress towards shutting
it down. Its origins lie in water
chlorination, a process that has killed
more people than any war in history.
There are deeper issues, of course, than
the cancer epidemic itself. The reasons
for it not being shut down, for example,
have a lot to do with our leaders
"business as usual" philosophy rather than
any genuine concern for the victims of
this mostly preventable man-made disease.
There remains, thankfully, the opportunity
to largely avoid the various cancers once
their common casual factor is
acknowledged.
Chlorination
Drinking water
chlorination is a process of water treatment that
uses chlorine, a chemical banned in warfare
because of its cruel mutilation of the human body
but, falsely, deemed to be safe in drinking water.
Chlorination produces two acids:
hydrochloric acid, which corrodes metal water
pipes, and hypochlorous acid, a very strong
oxidising agent. It is this oxidising agent that
kills all living things, good and bad, in water
supplies. Hypochlorous acid is the disinfecting
agent, not chlorine. Chlorination is just the
means of producing the hypochlorous acid.
It is this oxidising agent,
hypochlorous acid, that oxidises human DNA by
removing an electron from DNA, starting the cancer
process where the oxidised DNA takes on a
carcinogen at the location the electron has been
removed.
For every person
who dies of cancer, another dies of
ischaemic heart failure. This effect is
directly related to the same
chlorination process.
Ischaemic heart failure is heart failure
by oxygen starvation of the heart
muscle. Oxygen starvation occurs due to
an excess of cholesterol restricting the
blood supply.
Cholesterol is an antioxidant. It is the
only antioxidant we humans can produce
as a defence against the oxidative
assault of hypochlorous acid. The more
chlorinated water consumed, the more
cholesterol there will be. Eight glasses
of water a day is a death penalty.
So the first risk from
chlorination is that of heart failure
from blocked arteries and the second
risk is that of cancer when the
cholesterol defence is insufficient to
protect DNA from electron removal.
The United States Environmental
Protection Agency, the regulators of
water treatments in the United States,
are at least partly aware of the problem
and they put the cancer side of it this
way:
"Based on the weight
of evidence from both the human
epidemiology and animal toxicology
data on cancer and reproductive and
developmental health effects....EPA
concludes that: (1) current
reproductive and developmental
health effects data support a hazard
concern, (2) new cancer data
strengthens (sic) the evidence of an
association of chlorinated water
with bladder cancer and suggests an
association for colon and rectal
cancers and (3) the combined health
data warrant regulatory action..."
Federal Register Vol.68, Monday August 18 2003.
There are also numerous epidemiological
studies clearly showing the massive
difference between cancer rates in
chlorinated municipalities compared to
un-chlorinated municipal-ities, such as
this
1997 study in Taiwan. Please note that
the reference to chlorination at the end
is a requirement of publication, not the
reasoned conclusion of the authors. Of
particular note is Table 3 for a summary
of risks.
Despite the official acknowledgement of
the EPA in 2003 for the need to retire
chlorination in favour of better methods
of water treatment, health authorities
often continue to lie about the problem
by claiming that chlorination remains
the "best and most up to date" method of
making water "safe" to drink. In other
words, the "regulatory action" has not
happened. And will not.
A similar
problem occurs with fluoridation. I realise that
there is sometimes confusion about chlorination
and fluoridation - so I stress that these are two
different processes for different alleged
public health purposes.
But fluoridation highlights that it
is not just chlorination that continues to cause
harm. The reason for that harm, in its simplest
form, is that money trumps adverse health
effects every time.
The peddlers of these chemicals know
that sooner or later they will have to stop
selling them. The game, and it is a game to them,
is to do whatever is necessary to sell as much
product as possible for as long as possible before
being forcibly shut down. They are the sort of
people who don't lose any sleep over the trail of
dead and damaged people they leave in their wake.
Fluoridation
Fluoridation is the addition of
fluoride salts to drinking water supplies, where
those fluoride salts are not fluoride.
Fluoride naturally bonds to calcium.
Fluoride in this form when ingested will also be
excreted by the same amount.
The fluoride salts used for dosing
water supplies are, by comparison, a cumulative
poison as the fluoride in these salts dissociate
and, when ingested, these salts bond to calcium
rather than being excreted. They produce a cascade
of adverse health problems such as delayed puberty
in boys, lowered IQ, damaged teeth, etc etc.
As an example of the ill effects,
and to demonstrate these have been well documented
for some time, I refer you to two studies here
and here
by Kick et al dating back to 1933.
The fluoride salts used for dosing
drinking water are the very same salts removed
from fertilizer where, if it were left in the
fertilizer, would cause damage to livestock in the
form of damage to teeth, failure to thrive, etc
and farmers simply would stop buying the
fertilizer.
Health authorities still lie to us
by saying that hydrofluorosilicic
acid, that salt removed from fertilizer, is a form
of fluoride that is good for our teeth and
perfectly safe for our children. On both counts,
it is simply not true.
Manipulating the death rate
We often hear of the aging
population and the need to plan ahead. In all my
research I did not once find any evidence to
support this claim of an aging population.
What I did find was that when
chlorinated water has its pH adjusted using lime,
the death rates of both cancer and heart failure
can be adjusted according to a algorithmic scale.
In other words, if the pH is adjusted alkaline by
0.3 then the death rate will double.
All, then,
that regulators need to do is limit the
recommended pH levels for drinking water and the
over 65 age group will be limited accordingly.
In addition to the
casual relationship between adjusted pH and
death rates, and with the encouragement of Dr
Jim Sprott, I researched the connection between
electrical grounding and cancer death rates.
Electrical grounding
Many decades ago the National Fire
Protection Association of the United States
instituted a practice of electrical grounding,
including the use of metal water pipes as
phantom loop conductors.
The dogma was that this loop only
carried power under fault conditions.
From the insurance companies point
of view, electrical grounding was thought to
reduce the risk of fires and therefore the need
to pay fire related claims.
However, under normal operating
conditions the phantom loop created by
electrical grounding is completed by ionisation.
Ionisation imparts energy, as valency change, to
reactive oxygen species (ROS) in drinking water.
These ROS are created by the
chlorination process and their valency change
greatly increases the harms done to human
health. The effects on the rates of cancer and
heart failure were found to be directly
proportional to the length of conductive water
pipe in a reticulated and chlorinated water
supply.
Electrical grounding and the
chemical dosing of water supplies are not
isolated problems but connected parts of a
bigger picture.
Side-effects
There are significant side-effects
of chlorination.
As an indicative example,
chlorination is an oxidative process that strips
magnesium from drinking water and removes the
main source of magnesium required for good
mental health.
The EPA has indicated other effects
in the quote above.
Adding in the affects of
fluoridation, it becomes clear that modern man
is well on the way to being poisoned via his
water supply.
Why no action?
Governments involved in these
processes, along with the elite who make blood
money out of it, are seemingly above the law,
above criticism and dangerously deaf to their
own consciences.
I suggest that the empire these
madmen are creating is worth recognising for
what it is, and I think our survival justifies
the time and effort to distance ourselves from
it.
There is a short
poem called "Five ways to kill a man" by Edwin
Brock that concludes:
"In an age of aeroplanes, you may
fly
miles above your
victim and dispose of him by
pressing one small
switch. All you then
require is an ocean
to separate you, two
systems of
government, a nation's scientists,
several factories, a
psychopath and
land that no-one
needs for several years.
These are, as I
began, cumbersome ways
to kill a man.
Simpler, direct, and much more neat
is to see that he is
living somewhere in the middle
of the twentieth century, and
leave him there."
OK, so this
is 21st century. But it applies even more now, I
think.
Set yourself free
Paul Simon had a point, if I may slip into verse
so soon again:
"You just slip out the
back, Jack
Make a new plan,
Stan
You don't need to be
coy, Roy,
Just set yourself free"
I suggest there is a good
case for a retreat from the city and a move to the
country.
There will be problems of a different sort, but
going against the tide of urban drift has, I
think, some merit in avoiding the harms associated
with the open prisons we call cities, where the
inmates are fed poisoned water for profit.
If ditching the city is not
possible, then certainly an adaption to remove
dependency on reticulated services would seem to
be a very wise move.
Thank you for visiting.
Links (to be added to as
I may be able)
Owner
Builder exemption allowing you to do
restricted building, plumbing and electrical work.
Code
of Practice for DIY electrical work.
Water
tank stand design and building instructions.
Here
I have added a link for those of you with a
religious background.
updated
27 Sept. 2026